The Core i5-11400T is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Pentium G2120. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i5-11400T
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 36% less energy – 35 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of the Pentium G2120
The Core i5-11400T is better in every way
Core i5-11400T vs Pentium G2120 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i5-11400T
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
189
100%
Min 1% FPS
125
100%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Pentium G2120
Sep 3rd, 2012
Average FPS
168
89%
Min 1% FPS
113
90%
Price, $
$39.46
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
Core i5-11400T vs Pentium G2120 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-11400T vs Pentium G2120 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-11400T vs Pentium G2120 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-11400T
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.3 GHz
42%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Pentium G2120
Sep 3rd, 2012
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i5-11400T | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Pentium G2120 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
$182.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
35 W | Power Consumption | 55 W |
Performance | ||
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
1.3 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.1 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
12 MB | L3 Cache | 3 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 3200 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |