In Atomfall, the Core i5-11400T is slightly faster than the Celeron G3900. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-11400T
- Up to 13% faster in Atomfall – 214 vs 189 FPS
- Up to 13% faster in Atomfall
- Is 5 years and 6 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Sep 01, 2015
- Is 5 years and 6 months newer
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 35 vs 51 Watts
- Consumes up to 31% less energy
Celeron G3900
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-11400T vs Celeron G3900: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Celeron G3900
Sep 1st, 2015
Average FPS
189 FPS
88%
Min 1% FPS
141 FPS
88%
Price, $
$44.04
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-11400T vs Celeron G3900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-11400T vs Celeron G3900 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-11400T
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.3 GHz
46%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Celeron G3900
Sep 1st, 2015
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
4 MB
33%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
67%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-11400T Mar 16th, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Celeron G3900 Sep 1st, 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| $182.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1151 |
35W | Power Consumption | 51W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) |
| UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 510 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
