Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-12700F is 294 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-11400.
Advantages of Core i5-11400
- Up to 41% cheaper than Core i7-12700F - $139.99 vs $235.97
- Up to 38% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-12700F - $0.70 vs $1.13 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-12700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i7-12700F
- Performs up to 5% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-11400 - 208 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400 - 20 vs 12 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
199
96%
Value, $/FPS
$0.7/FPS
100%
Price, $
$139.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $139.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 42 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
208
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.13/FPS
62%
Price, $
$235.97
59%
FPS Winner
Buy for $235.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-11400 | vs | Core i7-12700F |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |