In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i5-11320H is slightly slower than the Core i7-9700F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-11320H
- Is 2 years and 1 month newer – Jun 21, 2021 vs Apr 23, 2019
- Is 2 years and 1 month newer
- Consumes up to 57% less energy – 28 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 57% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-9700F
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 173 vs 172 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i5-11320H vs Core i7-9700F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
173 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
129 FPS
100%
Price, $
$246.64
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.42/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-11320H vs Core i7-9700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-11320H vs Core i7-9700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-11320H
Jun 21st, 2021
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
96%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
83%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-11320H Jun 21st, 2021 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-9700F Apr 23rd, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jun 21st, 2021 | Released | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
$309.00 | MSRP | $333.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1449 | Socket | LGA1151 |
28 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
Iris XE 96EU | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
