HowManyFPS Desktop App v1.29.2Track Bottlenecks and Boost Your FPSOpen HowManyFPS.com on your PC to benchmark

CPU Comparison: FPS, Specs & Value

Core i5-11300H vs Core Ultra 9 285

The Core i5-11300H is quite a bit slower than the Core Ultra 9 285 on average across 100+ games. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.

bar_chartBenchmarks groupCommunity calculateFPS Calculator compressBottleneck Calculator

CPU

View All CPUs

Up to 87% cheaper – $309 vs $579
Up to 15% better value for money

CPU

Out of StockView CPUAll CPUs

Up to 63% faster on average across 100+ games
Is 4 years and 1 month newer
Up to 87% more expensive – $579 vs $309

FPS Comparison Across Popular Games

Predicted average FPS at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K, based on real game benchmarks.

Resolution

Quality

Paired GPU

View Compare All GPUs

Select GPU

Grand Theft Auto V2013

Core i5-11300H

209FPS

Core Ultra 9 285

225FPS

League of Legends2009

Core i5-11300H

253FPS

Core Ultra 9 285

423FPS

Overwatch 22023

Core i5-11300H

528FPS

Core Ultra 9 285

576FPS

Minecraft2011

652FPS

842FPS

580FPS

756FPS

Valorant2020

Core i5-11300H

623FPS

Core Ultra 9 285

804FPS

Dota 22013

Core i5-11300H

205FPS

Core Ultra 9 285

310FPS

World of Warcraft2004

Core i5-11300H

213FPS

Core Ultra 9 285

254FPS

Specs & Benchmark Comparison

Side-by-side specs, synthetic benchmarks, and key hardware differences.

Scorehelp

Core i5-11300H

43%

Core Ultra 9 285

72%

Core Ultra 9 285 ranks 29 points higher.

Coreshelp

Core i5-11300H

Core Ultra 9 285

Core Ultra 9 285 has 20 more cores.

Threadshelp

Core i5-11300H

Core Ultra 9 285

Core Ultra 9 285 has 16 more threads.

L3 Cachehelp

Core i5-11300H

8 MB

Core Ultra 9 285

36 MB

Core Ultra 9 285 has 28 MB more L3 cache.

Base Frequencyhelp

Core i5-11300H

2.6 GHz

Core Ultra 9 285

2.5 GHz

Core i5-11300H has a 4% higher base clock.

Turbo Frequencyhelp

Core i5-11300H

4.4 GHz

Core Ultra 9 285

5.6 GHz

Core Ultra 9 285 boosts 27% higher.

TDPhelp

Core i5-11300H

28W

Core Ultra 9 285

65W

Core i5-11300H draws 37W less power.

Pricehelp

Core i5-11300H

Core Ultra 9 285

Core i5-11300HCore Ultra 9 285

Intel BGA 1449

Sockethelp

LGA1851

Tiger Lake-H

Codenamehelp

Arrow Lake-S

Mobile

Segmenthelp

Desktop

Iris XE 80EU

Integrated GPUhelp

Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU

3200 MHz (DDR4)

RAMhelp

6400 MHz (DDR5)

Not Overclockable

Overclock Supporthelp

Not Overclockable

Frequently Asked Questions

compare_arrowsWhich is better, Core i5-11300H or Core Ultra 9 285?expand_more

The Core Ultra 9 285. It's 67% faster than the Core i5-11300H on average across 100+ games, scoring 72/100 vs 43/100 in our gaming rating.

speedHow much faster is Core Ultra 9 285 than Core i5-11300H?expand_more

67% faster on average. The gap varies by game and resolution, check the per-game FPS comparison above.

aspect_ratioWhich is better for 1440p and 4K gaming, Core i5-11300H or Core Ultra 9 285?expand_more

The Core Ultra 9 285 is faster at both resolutions. Toggle the resolution selector above to see per-game FPS.

paidIs the Core Ultra 9 285 worth buying in 2026?expand_more

It scores 72/100 in our gaming rating, faster than most CPUs on the market. Good buy if the price is right.

differenceWhat is the difference between Core i5-11300H and Core Ultra 9 285?expand_more

Performance: Core i5-11300H scores 43/100, Core Ultra 9 285 scores 72/100. They also differ in core count, clock speeds, L3 cache, and power draw. Full breakdown in the specs section above.

compressWill the Core i5-11300H or Core Ultra 9 285 bottleneck my PC?expand_more

Depends on the rest of your build, especially your GPU. Swap the paired GPU in the FPS section above to see if it limits performance, or use our bottleneck calculator for a full analysis.

upgradeIs it worth upgrading to the Core i5-11300H or Core Ultra 9 285?expand_more

The Core Ultra 9 285 is the stronger pick at 72/100. Compare your current CPU against it to see the exact FPS gain across 100+ games.