Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10600KF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10600KF is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 1265 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10600KF.
Advantages of Core i5-10600KF
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - $118.00 vs $433.00
- Up to 68% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i9-14900K - $0.65 vs $2.00 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 20% better in No Man's Sky than Core i5-10600KF - 217 vs 181 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
181
83%
Value, $/FPS
$0.65/FPS
100%
Price, $
$118
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $118 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66 minutes ago
Buy for $433 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-10600KF | vs | Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |