Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10600KF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10600KF is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 1348 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10600KF.
Advantages of Core i5-10600KF
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i7-14700F - $118.00 vs $273.18
- Up to 52% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-14700F - $0.61 vs $1.26 per FPS
Advantages of Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 12% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-10600KF - 217 vs 193 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 28 vs 12 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
193
89%
Value, $/FPS
$0.61/FPS
100%
Price, $
$118
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $118 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4576 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
217
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.26/FPS
48%
Price, $
$273.18
43%
FPS Winner
Buy for $273.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4574 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-10600KF | vs | Core i7-14700F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 20 |
12 | Threads | 28 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |