Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10600KF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10600KF is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-12700F is 614 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10600KF.
Advantages of Core i5-10600KF
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i7-12700F - $118.00 vs $235.99
- Up to 46% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-12700F - $0.61 vs $1.13 per FPS
Advantages of Core i7-12700F
- Performs up to 8% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-10600KF - 208 vs 193 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
193
93%
Value, $/FPS
$0.61/FPS
100%
Price, $
$118
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $118 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5232 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
208
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.13/FPS
54%
Price, $
$235.99
50%
FPS Winner
Buy for $235.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5232 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-10600KF | vs | Core i7-12700F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |