In The Callisto Protocol, the Core i5-10600KF is slightly faster than the Core i5-9400F. However, it's a worse value for money, as it's $29 more expensive!
Core i5-10600KF
- Up to 6% faster in The Callisto Protocol – 129 vs 122 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in The Callisto Protocol
- Is 1 year and 3 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Jan 08, 2019
- Is 1 year and 3 months newer
Core i5-9400F
- Up to 19% cheaper – $119.99 vs $149.00
- Up to 19% cheaper
- Up to 15% better value in The Callisto Protocol – $0.98 vs $1.15/FPS
- Up to 15% better value in The Callisto Protocol
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
The Callisto Protocol FPS Calculator
Core i5-10600KF vs Core i5-9400F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-10600KF
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
129 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
93 FPS
100%
Price, $
$149
80%
Value, $/FPS
$1.15/FPS
85%
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
122 FPS
95%
Min 1% FPS
88 FPS
95%
Price, $
$119.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.98/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-10600KF vs Core i5-9400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-10600KF vs Core i5-9400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-10600KF
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
75%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
71%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
85%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-10600KF Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-9400F Jan 8th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
