Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10600KF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10600KF is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12400 is 614 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10600KF.
Advantages of Core i5-10600KF
- Up to 9% cheaper than Core i5-12400 - $118.00 vs $129.99
- Up to 2% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-12400 - $1.05 vs $1.07 per FPS
Advantages of Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 8% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-10600KF - 121 vs 112 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
112
93%
Value, $/FPS
$1.05/FPS
100%
Price, $
$118
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $118 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 193 minutes ago
Buy for $129.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 193 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-10600KF | vs | Core i5-12400 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |