In Atomfall, the Core i5-10600KF is slightly faster than the Core i5-10400F. However, it's a slightly worse value for money, as it's $9 more expensive!
Core i5-10600KF
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall – 217 vs 212 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall
Core i5-10400F
- Up to 6% cheaper – $139.55 vs $149.00
- Up to 6% cheaper
- Up to 4% better value in Atomfall – $0.65 vs $0.68/FPS
- Up to 4% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-10600KF vs Core i5-10400F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-10600KF
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
217 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
162 FPS
100%
Price, $
$149
93%
Value, $/FPS
$0.68/FPS
96%
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
212 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
159 FPS
98%
Price, $
$139.55
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.65/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-10600KF vs Core i5-10400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-10600KF vs Core i5-10400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-10600KF
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
71%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
90%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-10600KF Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-10400F Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1200 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
