In Deathloop, the Core i5-10600K is slightly slower than the Xeon E5520. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-10600K
- Is 11 years and 1 month newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Mar 30, 2009
- Is 11 years and 1 month newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5520
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 223 vs 221 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 36% less energy – 80 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 36% less energy
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i5-10600K vs Xeon E5520: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-10600K
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
221 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
166 FPS
99%
Price, $
$182.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.82/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-10600K vs Xeon E5520 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-10600K vs Xeon E5520 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-10600K
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Xeon E5520
Mar 30th, 2009
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
2.266 GHz
55%
Turbo Frequency
2.533 GHz
53%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-10600K Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5520 Mar 30th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Mar 30th, 2009 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1366 |
| 125W | Power Consumption | 80W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
