In Battlefield 6, the Core i5-10600K is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-13900. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $399 cheaper!
Core i5-10600K
- Up to 69% cheaper – $177.99 vs $576.99
- Up to 69% cheaper
- Up to 53% better value in Battlefield 6 – $2.14 vs $4.54/FPS
- Up to 53% better value in Battlefield 6
Core i9-13900
- Up to 53% faster in Battlefield 6 – 127 vs 83 FPS
- Up to 53% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 2 years and 8 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Apr 30, 2020
- Is 2 years and 8 months newer
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i5-10600K vs Core i9-13900: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-10600K
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
83 FPS
65%
Min 1% FPS
62 FPS
65%
Price, $
$177.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.14/FPS
100%
Core i9-13900
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
127 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
95 FPS
100%
Price, $
$576.99
30%
Value, $/FPS
$4.54/FPS
47%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-10600K vs Core i9-13900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-10600K vs Core i9-13900 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-10600K
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
25%
L3 Cache
12 MB
33%
Base Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
86%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
48%
Core i9-13900
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
49%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-10600K Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900 Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $549.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
