In Deathloop, the Core i5-10600 is slightly slower than the Core i9-14900F and it's also a worse value for money, as it's $54 more expensive!
Core i5-10600
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-14900F
- Up to 9% faster in Deathloop – 241 vs 221 FPS
- Up to 9% faster in Deathloop
- Is 3 years and 8 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Apr 30, 2020
- Is 3 years and 8 months newer
- Up to 10% cheaper – $476.00 vs $529.95
- Up to 10% cheaper
- Up to 18% better value in Deathloop – $1.97 vs $2.39/FPS
- Up to 18% better value in Deathloop
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i5-10600 vs Core i9-14900F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-10600
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
221 FPS
92%
Min 1% FPS
166 FPS
92%
Price, $
$529.95
89%
Value, $/FPS
$2.39/FPS
82%
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
241 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
181 FPS
100%
Price, $
$476
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.97/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-10600 vs Core i9-14900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-10600 vs Core i9-14900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-10600
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
25%
L3 Cache
12 MB
33%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
83%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
48%
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
61%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-10600 Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $524.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
