In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i5-10400H is slightly slower than the Xeon X3440. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-10400H
- Is 10 years and 6 months newer – Apr 02, 2020 vs Sep 08, 2009
- Is 10 years and 6 months newer
- Consumes up to 53% less energy – 45 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 53% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon X3440
- Up to 14% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 200 vs 175 FPS
- Up to 14% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i5-10400H vs Xeon X3440: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-10400H vs Xeon X3440 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-10400H vs Xeon X3440 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-10400H
Apr 2nd, 2020
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Xeon X3440
Sep 8th, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.533 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
2.933 GHz
64%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
45%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-10400H Apr 2nd, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon X3440 Sep 8th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 2nd, 2020 | Released | Sep 8th, 2009 |
| – | MSRP | $215.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Server |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | LGA1156 |
45 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2933 MHz (DDR3), 2933 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
UHD Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
