In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i5-10400H is slightly slower than the Xeon L5640. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-10400H
- Is 10 years and 17 days newer – Apr 02, 2020 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 10 years and 17 days newer
- Consumes up to 25% less energy – 45 vs 60 Watts
- Consumes up to 25% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon L5640
- Up to 16% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 204 vs 176 FPS
- Up to 16% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i5-10400H vs Xeon L5640: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-10400H vs Xeon L5640 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-10400H vs Xeon L5640 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-10400H
Apr 2nd, 2020
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
6 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Xeon L5640
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.266 GHz
87%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
61%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-10400H Apr 2nd, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon L5640 Mar 16th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 2nd, 2020 | Released | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Server |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | LGA1366 |
45 W | Power Consumption | 60 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2933 MHz (DDR3), 2933 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
