In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i5-10400H is slightly faster than the Core i7-9700F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-10400H
- Up to 2% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 176 vs 172 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Is 11 months and 10 days newer – Apr 02, 2020 vs Apr 23, 2019
- Is 11 months and 10 days newer
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 45 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 31% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-9700F
No clear advantages
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i5-10400H vs Core i7-9700F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
172 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
129 FPS
98%
Price, $
$247.3
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.43/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-10400H vs Core i7-9700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-10400H vs Core i7-9700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-10400H
Apr 2nd, 2020
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
87%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
98%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
91%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-10400H Apr 2nd, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-9700F Apr 23rd, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 2nd, 2020 | Released | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | $333.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | LGA1151 |
45 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2933 MHz (DDR3), 2933 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
