In Battlefield 6, the Core i5-10400H is quite a bit slower than the Core i7-12700F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-10400H
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 45 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 31% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-12700F
- Up to 49% faster in Battlefield 6 – 110 vs 74 FPS
- Up to 49% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 1 year and 9 months newer – Jan 04, 2022 vs Apr 02, 2020
- Is 1 year and 9 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i5-10400H vs Core i7-12700F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-12700F
Jan 4th, 2022
Average FPS
110 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
82 FPS
100%
Price, $
$244.97
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.22/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-10400H vs Core i7-12700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-10400H vs Core i7-12700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-10400H
Apr 2nd, 2020
Cores
4-core
33%
L3 Cache
6 MB
24%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
94%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
61%
Core i7-12700F
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
25 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.1 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-10400H Apr 2nd, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-12700F Jan 4th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 2nd, 2020 | Released | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $324.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | LGA1700 |
45 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2933 MHz (DDR3), 2933 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
UHD Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
