In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i5-10400F is slightly slower than the Xeon W3550. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-10400F
- Is 10 years and 8 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Aug 09, 2009
- Is 10 years and 8 months newer
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
Xeon W3550
- Up to 14% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 198 vs 174 FPS
- Up to 14% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i5-10400F vs Xeon W3550: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
174 FPS
88%
Min 1% FPS
130 FPS
87%
Price, $
$169.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.97/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-10400F vs Xeon W3550 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-10400F vs Xeon W3550 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Xeon W3550
Aug 9th, 2009
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.066 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
78%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-10400F Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon W3550 Aug 9th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Aug 9th, 2009 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1366 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
