In Battlefield 6, the Core i5-10400F is slower than the Ryzen 9 5900X. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $129 cheaper!
Core i5-10400F
- Up to 48% cheaper – $139.55 vs $269.00
- Up to 48% cheaper
- Up to 31% better value in Battlefield 6 – $1.78 vs $2.58/FPS
- Up to 31% better value in Battlefield 6
- Consumes up to 38% less energy – 65 vs 105 Watts
- Consumes up to 38% less energy
Ryzen 9 5900X
- Up to 33% faster in Battlefield 6 – 104 vs 78 FPS
- Up to 33% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 6 months and 6 days newer – Nov 05, 2020 vs Apr 30, 2020
- Is 6 months and 6 days newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen 9 5900X: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
78 FPS
75%
Min 1% FPS
58 FPS
74%
Price, $
$139.55
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.78/FPS
100%
Ryzen 9 5900X
Nov 5th, 2020
Average FPS
104 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
78 FPS
100%
Price, $
$269
51%
Value, $/FPS
$2.58/FPS
69%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen 9 5900X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen 9 5900X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
50%
L3 Cache
12 MB
19%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
78%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
90%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
83%
Ryzen 9 5900X
Nov 5th, 2020
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-10400F Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 9 5900X Nov 5th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Nov 5th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | $549.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | AM4 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 105 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
