In Rust, the Core i5-10400F is slightly slower than the Ryzen 5 3600X and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $64 more expensive!
Core i5-10400F
- Is 9 months and 24 days newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Jul 07, 2019
- Is 9 months and 24 days newer
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
Ryzen 5 3600X
- Up to 3% faster in Rust – 234 vs 228 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Rust
- Up to 38% cheaper – $105.89 vs $169.95
- Up to 38% cheaper
- Up to 39% better value in Rust – $0.45 vs $0.74/FPS
- Up to 39% better value in Rust
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen 5 3600X: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
228 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
56 FPS
93%
Price, $
$169.95
62%
Value, $/FPS
$0.74/FPS
61%
Ryzen 5 3600X
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
234 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
60 FPS
100%
Price, $
$105.89
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.45/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen 5 3600X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen 5 3600X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
98%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
83%
Ryzen 5 3600X
Jul 7th, 2019
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-10400F Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 5 3600X Jul 7th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | $249.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | AM4 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
