In Rust, the Core i5-10400F is slower than the Core Ultra 9 285. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $424 cheaper!
Core i5-10400F
- Up to 75% cheaper – $139.55 vs $563.41
- Up to 75% cheaper
- Up to 69% better value in Rust – $0.61 vs $1.98/FPS
- Up to 69% better value in Rust
Core Ultra 9 285
- Up to 25% faster in Rust – 284 vs 228 FPS
- Up to 25% faster in Rust
- Is 4 years and 8 months newer – Jan 14, 2025 vs Apr 30, 2020
- Is 4 years and 8 months newer
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i5-10400F vs Core Ultra 9 285: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
228 FPS
80%
Min 1% FPS
56 FPS
60%
Price, $
$139.55
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.61/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 14th, 2025
Average FPS
284 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
94 FPS
100%
Price, $
$563.41
24%
Value, $/FPS
$1.98/FPS
31%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-10400F vs Core Ultra 9 285 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-10400F vs Core Ultra 9 285 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
25%
L3 Cache
12 MB
33%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
77%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
42%
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 14th, 2025
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
86%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-10400F Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 285 Jan 14th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Jan 14th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $579.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
