In Deathloop, the Core i5-10400F is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 7 265KF. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $156 cheaper!
Core i5-10400F
- Up to 52% cheaper – $143.07 vs $298.98
- Up to 52% cheaper
- Up to 47% better value in Deathloop – $0.65 vs $1.22/FPS
- Up to 47% better value in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 48% less energy
Core Ultra 7 265KF
- Up to 11% faster in Deathloop – 245 vs 220 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in Deathloop
- Is 4 years and 5 months newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Apr 30, 2020
- Is 4 years and 5 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i5-10400F vs Core Ultra 7 265KF: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
220 FPS
90%
Min 1% FPS
165 FPS
90%
Price, $
$143.07
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.65/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 7 265KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
245 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
183 FPS
100%
Price, $
$298.98
47%
Value, $/FPS
$1.22/FPS
53%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-10400F vs Core Ultra 7 265KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-10400F vs Core Ultra 7 265KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
30%
L3 Cache
12 MB
40%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
74%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
78%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
42%
Core Ultra 7 265KF
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-10400F Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265KF Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $379.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1851 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
