In Atomfall, the Core i5-10400F is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 7 265F. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $148 cheaper!
Core i5-10400F
- Up to 52% cheaper – $139.55 vs $288.00
- Up to 52% cheaper
- Up to 44% better value in Atomfall – $0.65 vs $1.17/FPS
- Up to 44% better value in Atomfall
Core Ultra 7 265F
- Up to 16% faster in Atomfall – 245 vs 212 FPS
- Up to 16% faster in Atomfall
- Is 4 years and 8 months newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Apr 30, 2020
- Is 4 years and 8 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-10400F vs Core Ultra 7 265F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
212 FPS
87%
Min 1% FPS
159 FPS
86%
Price, $
$139.55
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.65/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Average FPS
245 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$288
48%
Value, $/FPS
$1.17/FPS
56%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-10400F vs Core Ultra 7 265F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-10400F vs Core Ultra 7 265F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
30%
L3 Cache
12 MB
40%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
81%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
42%
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-10400F Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265F Jan 7th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Jan 7th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $379.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1851 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
