In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i5-10400F is slightly faster than the Core i9-14900HX. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-10400F
- Up to 3% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 174 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in The Last of Us Part II
Core i9-14900HX
- Is 3 years and 8 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Apr 30, 2020
- Is 3 years and 8 months newer
- Consumes up to 15% less energy – 55 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 15% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i5-10400F vs Core i9-14900HX: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
174 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
130 FPS
100%
Price, $
$139.55
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.8/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-10400F vs Core i9-14900HX in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-10400F vs Core i9-14900HX in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
25%
L3 Cache
12 MB
33%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
74%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
48%
Core i9-14900HX
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-10400F Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900HX Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | Intel BGA 1964 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 55 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
