In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i5-10400F is slightly slower than the Core i7-980X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-10400F
- Is 10 years and 1 month newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Mar 16, 2010
- Is 10 years and 1 month newer
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
Core i7-980X
- Up to 11% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 194 vs 174 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i5-10400F vs Core i7-980X: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
174 FPS
90%
Min 1% FPS
130 FPS
89%
Price, $
$169.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.97/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-10400F vs Core i7-980X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-10400F vs Core i7-980X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
87%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i7-980X
Mar 16th, 2010
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.333 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
84%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-10400F Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-980X Mar 16th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Mar 16th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1366 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
