In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i5-10400F is slightly slower than the Core i7-930. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $137 cheaper!
Core i5-10400F
- Is 10 years and 2 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Feb 28, 2010
- Is 10 years and 2 months newer
- Up to 45% cheaper – $169.95 vs $307.29
- Up to 45% cheaper
- Up to 37% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.97 vs $1.53/FPS
- Up to 37% better value in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 50% less energy – 65 vs 130 Watts
- Consumes up to 50% less energy
Core i7-930
- Up to 15% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 200 vs 174 FPS
- Up to 15% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i5-10400F vs Core i7-930: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
174 FPS
87%
Min 1% FPS
130 FPS
87%
Price, $
$169.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.97/FPS
100%
Core i7-930
Feb 28th, 2010
Average FPS
200 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
150 FPS
100%
Price, $
$307.29
55%
Value, $/FPS
$1.53/FPS
63%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-10400F vs Core i7-930 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-10400F vs Core i7-930 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i7-930
Feb 28th, 2010
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
3.066 GHz
71%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-10400F Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-930 Feb 28th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Feb 28th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1366 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
