In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i5-10400F is slightly slower than the Core i7-620M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-10400F
- Is 10 years and 3 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 10 years and 3 months newer
Core i7-620M
- Up to 17% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 204 vs 174 FPS
- Up to 17% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i5-10400F vs Core i7-620M: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
174 FPS
85%
Min 1% FPS
130 FPS
85%
Price, $
$169.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.97/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-10400F vs Core i7-620M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-10400F vs Core i7-620M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i7-620M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
4 MB
33%
Base Frequency
2.677 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
3.333 GHz
78%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
40%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-10400F Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-620M Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | $332.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | Intel BGA 1288 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | HD Graphics (Ironlake) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
