In Battlefield 6, the Core i5-10400F is slightly faster than the Core i7-5930K and it's also a better value for money, as it's $29 cheaper!
Core i5-10400F
- Up to 8% faster in Battlefield 6 – 78 vs 72 FPS
- Up to 8% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 5 years and 7 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Sep 01, 2014
- Is 5 years and 7 months newer
- Up to 17% cheaper – $139.55 vs $169.00
- Up to 17% cheaper
- Up to 24% better value in Battlefield 6 – $1.78 vs $2.34/FPS
- Up to 24% better value in Battlefield 6
- Consumes up to 54% less energy – 65 vs 140 Watts
- Consumes up to 54% less energy
Core i7-5930K
No clear advantages
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i5-10400F vs Core i7-5930K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
78 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
58 FPS
100%
Price, $
$139.55
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.78/FPS
100%
Core i7-5930K
Sep 1st, 2014
Average FPS
72 FPS
92%
Min 1% FPS
54 FPS
93%
Price, $
$169
82%
Value, $/FPS
$2.34/FPS
76%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-10400F vs Core i7-5930K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-10400F vs Core i7-5930K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
80%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i7-5930K
Sep 1st, 2014
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
15 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
86%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
80%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-10400F Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-5930K Sep 1st, 2014 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Sep 1st, 2014 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA2011-3 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 140 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2133 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
