In The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, the Core i5-10400F is slightly slower than the Core i7-4702HQ. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-10400F
- Is 6 years and 11 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs May 27, 2013
- Is 6 years and 11 months newer
Core i7-4702HQ
- Up to 3% faster in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt – 221 vs 214 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
- Consumes up to 43% less energy – 37 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 43% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt FPS Calculator
Core i5-10400F vs Core i7-4702HQ: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
214 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
148 FPS
98%
Price, $
$129.08
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.6/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-10400F vs Core i7-4702HQ in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-10400F vs Core i7-4702HQ in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i7-4702HQ
May 27th, 2013
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
6 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
3.2 GHz
74%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
60%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-10400F Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-4702HQ May 27th, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | May 27th, 2013 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | Intel BGA 1364 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 37 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 1600 MHz (DDR3) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4600 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
