In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i5-10400F is slightly faster than the Core i7-10700F and it's also a better value for money, as it's $160 cheaper!
Core i5-10400F
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 174 vs 172 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 48% cheaper – $169.95 vs $329.95
- Up to 48% cheaper
- Up to 49% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.97 vs $1.91/FPS
- Up to 49% better value in The Last of Us Part II
Core i7-10700F
No clear advantages
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i5-10400F vs Core i7-10700F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
174 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
131 FPS
100%
Price, $
$169.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.97/FPS
100%
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
172 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
129 FPS
98%
Price, $
$329.95
51%
Value, $/FPS
$1.91/FPS
51%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-10400F vs Core i7-10700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-10400F vs Core i7-10700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
12 MB
75%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
90%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
91%
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-10400F Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-10700F Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1200 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
