In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i5-10400F is slightly slower than the Core i5-9400F and it's also a worse value for money, as it's $50 more expensive!
Core i5-10400F
- Is 1 year and 3 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Jan 08, 2019
- Is 1 year and 3 months newer
Core i5-9400F
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 175 vs 174 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 29% cheaper – $119.99 vs $169.95
- Up to 29% cheaper
- Up to 30% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.68 vs $0.97/FPS
- Up to 30% better value in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i5-10400F vs Core i5-9400F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
174 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
130 FPS
99%
Price, $
$169.95
70%
Value, $/FPS
$0.97/FPS
70%
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
175 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
131 FPS
100%
Price, $
$119.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.68/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-10400F vs Core i5-9400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-10400F vs Core i5-9400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
75%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
95%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-10400F Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-9400F Jan 8th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
