In Rust, the Core i5-10400F is slightly faster than the Core i5-4670T. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-10400F
- Up to 6% faster in Rust – 228 vs 216 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in Rust
- Is 6 years and 10 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Jun 02, 2013
- Is 6 years and 10 months newer
Core i5-4670T
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 45 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 31% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i5-10400F vs Core i5-4670T: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
228 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
56 FPS
100%
Price, $
$169.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.74/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-10400F vs Core i5-4670T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-10400F vs Core i5-4670T in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i5-4670T
Jun 2nd, 2013
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
6 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.3 GHz
79%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
77%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-10400F Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-4670T Jun 2nd, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1150 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 45 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4600 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
