Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 979 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Core i5-10400F
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $74.38 vs $849.99
- Up to 90% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-13400F - $0.56 vs $5.74 per FPS
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 12% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-10400F - 148 vs 132 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 16 vs 12 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
132
89%
Value, $/FPS
$0.56/FPS
100%
Price, $
$74.38
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $74.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6426 minutes ago
Buy for $849.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6424 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-10400F | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |