Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12400 is 614 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Core i5-10400F
- Up to 48% cheaper than Core i5-12400 - $74.38 vs $143.57
- Up to 46% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i5-12400 - $0.49 vs $0.91 per FPS
Advantages of Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 4% better in Dead Space than Core i5-10400F - 158 vs 152 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
152
96%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
100%
Price, $
$74.38
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $74.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6434 minutes ago
Buy for $143.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6433 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-10400F | vs | Core i5-12400 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |