In The Callisto Protocol, the Core i5-10400F is faster than the Core i3-370M. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-10400F
- Up to 20% faster in The Callisto Protocol – 124 vs 103 FPS
- Up to 20% faster in The Callisto Protocol
- Is 9 years and 10 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Jun 20, 2010
- Is 9 years and 10 months newer
Core i3-370M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
The Callisto Protocol FPS Calculator
Core i5-10400F vs Core i3-370M: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
124 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
90 FPS
100%
Price, $
$175.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.41/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-10400F vs Core i3-370M in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-10400F vs Core i3-370M in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i3-370M
Jun 20th, 2010
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-10400F Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-370M Jun 20th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Jun 20th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGAG1 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
