In Atomfall, the Core i5-10400F is slightly slower than the Core i3-12100F and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $82 more expensive!
Core i5-10400F
No clear advantages
Core i3-12100F
- Up to 7% faster in Atomfall – 225 vs 211 FPS
- Up to 7% faster in Atomfall
- Is 1 year and 8 months newer – Jan 17, 2022 vs Apr 30, 2020
- Is 1 year and 8 months newer
- Up to 47% cheaper – $93.99 vs $175.99
- Up to 47% cheaper
- Up to 51% better value in Atomfall – $0.41 vs $0.83/FPS
- Up to 51% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 11% less energy – 58 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 11% less energy
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i5-10400F vs Core i3-12100F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
211 FPS
94%
Min 1% FPS
158 FPS
93%
Price, $
$175.99
53%
Value, $/FPS
$0.83/FPS
49%
Core i3-12100F
Jan 17th, 2022
Average FPS
225 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
169 FPS
100%
Price, $
$93.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-10400F vs Core i3-12100F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-10400F vs Core i3-12100F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
88%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
56%
Core i3-12100F
Jan 17th, 2022
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-10400F Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-12100F Jan 17th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Jan 17th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $97.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 58 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
