In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i5-10400F is slightly slower than the Core i3-10105F and it's also a worse value for money, as it's $31 more expensive!
Core i5-10400F
No clear advantages
Core i3-10105F
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 175 vs 174 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Is 10 months and 15 days newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Apr 30, 2020
- Is 10 months and 15 days newer
- Up to 18% cheaper – $138.99 vs $169.95
- Up to 18% cheaper
- Up to 19% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.79 vs $0.97/FPS
- Up to 19% better value in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i5-10400F vs Core i3-10105F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
174 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
130 FPS
99%
Price, $
$169.95
81%
Value, $/FPS
$0.97/FPS
81%
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
175 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
131 FPS
100%
Price, $
$138.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.79/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-10400F vs Core i3-10105F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-10400F vs Core i3-10105F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
78%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
98%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i3-10105F
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
6 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-10400F Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-10105F Mar 16th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| – | MSRP | $97.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1200 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
