In Deathloop, the Core i5-10400F is slightly slower than the Celeron 847. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-10400F
- Is 8 years and 10 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Jun 19, 2011
- Is 8 years and 10 months newer
Celeron 847
- Up to 5% faster in Deathloop – 230 vs 220 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 74% less energy – 17 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 74% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i5-10400F vs Celeron 847: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-10400F vs Celeron 847 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-10400F vs Celeron 847 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Celeron 847
Jun 19th, 2011
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
2 MB
17%
Base Frequency
1.1 GHz
38%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-10400F Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Celeron 847 Jun 19th, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 19th, 2011 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | Intel BGA 1023 |
| 65W | Power Consumption | 17W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
