In Rust, the Core i5-10400 is slightly faster than the Xeon E5649. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-10400
- Up to 9% faster in Rust – 227 vs 208 FPS
- Up to 9% faster in Rust
- Is 9 years and 2 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Feb 14, 2011
- Is 9 years and 2 months newer
- Consumes up to 19% less energy – 65 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 19% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5649
No clear advantages
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i5-10400 vs Xeon E5649: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-10400
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
227 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
56 FPS
100%
Price, $
$169.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.74/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-10400 vs Xeon E5649 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-10400 vs Xeon E5649 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-10400
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Xeon E5649
Feb 14th, 2011
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.533 GHz
87%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
65%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-10400 Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5649 Feb 14th, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Feb 14th, 2011 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1366 |
65W | Power Consumption | 80W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
