In Control, the Core i5-10400 is slightly slower than the Core i9-14900F. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $413 cheaper!
Core i5-10400
- Up to 74% cheaper – $147.00 vs $559.99
- Up to 74% cheaper
- Up to 73% better value in Control – $0.59 vs $2.20/FPS
- Up to 73% better value in Control
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-14900F
- Up to 2% faster in Control – 254 vs 249 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Control
- Is 3 years and 8 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Apr 30, 2020
- Is 3 years and 8 months newer
Control FPS Calculator
Core i5-10400 vs Core i9-14900F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-10400
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
249 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
98%
Price, $
$147
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.59/FPS
100%
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
254 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
167 FPS
100%
Price, $
$559.99
26%
Value, $/FPS
$2.2/FPS
27%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-10400 vs Core i9-14900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-10400 vs Core i9-14900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-10400
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
25%
L3 Cache
12 MB
33%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
74%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
48%
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-10400 Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900F Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $524.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
