Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900 is 1348 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400.
Advantages of Core i5-10400
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i9-14900 - $124.95 vs $574.75
- Up to 75% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-14900 - $1.02 vs $4.13 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900
- Performs up to 14% better in Elden Ring than Core i5-10400 - 139 vs 122 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400 - 32 vs 12 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
122
88%
Value, $/FPS
$1.02/FPS
100%
Price, $
$124.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $124.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 405 minutes ago
Buy for $574.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 403 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-10400 | vs | Core i9-14900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |