In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i5-10400 is slightly slower than the Core i7-8700 and it's also a worse value for money, as it's $26 more expensive!
Core i5-10400
- Is 2 years and 6 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Oct 05, 2017
- Is 2 years and 6 months newer
Core i7-8700
- Up to 2% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 177 vs 174 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 15% cheaper – $148.99 vs $174.99
- Up to 15% cheaper
- Up to 16% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.84 vs $1.00/FPS
- Up to 16% better value in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i5-10400 vs Core i7-8700: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-10400
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
174 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
130 FPS
98%
Price, $
$174.99
85%
Value, $/FPS
$1/FPS
84%
Core i7-8700
Oct 5th, 2017
Average FPS
177 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
133 FPS
100%
Price, $
$148.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.84/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-10400 vs Core i7-8700 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-10400 vs Core i7-8700 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-10400
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
93%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i7-8700
Oct 5th, 2017
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-10400 Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-8700 Oct 5th, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Oct 5th, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | $303.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
