In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i5-10400 is slightly slower than the Core i5-6600 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $48 more expensive!
Core i5-10400
- Is 4 years and 9 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Jul 01, 2015
- Is 4 years and 9 months newer
Core i5-6600
- Up to 2% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 178 vs 174 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 33% cheaper – $98.99 vs $147.00
- Up to 33% cheaper
- Up to 35% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.55 vs $0.84/FPS
- Up to 35% better value in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i5-10400 vs Core i5-6600: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-10400
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
174 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
130 FPS
98%
Price, $
$147
67%
Value, $/FPS
$0.84/FPS
65%
Core i5-6600
Jul 1st, 2015
Average FPS
178 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
133 FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.55/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-10400 vs Core i5-6600 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-10400 vs Core i5-6600 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-10400
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
88%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i5-6600
Jul 1st, 2015
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
6 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
91%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2133 MHz
80%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-10400 Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-6600 Jul 1st, 2015 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Jul 1st, 2015 |
| – | MSRP | $224.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2133 MHz (DDR3), 2133 MHz (DDR4) |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 530 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
