The Core i5-10400 is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Core i5-2500K and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $12.49 cheaper!
Advantages of the Core i5-10400
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 9% cheaper – $129.59 vs $142.08
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of the Core i5-2500K
The Core i5-10400 is better in every way
Core i5-10400 vs Core i5-2500K
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i5-10400
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
203
100%
Min 1% FPS
139
100%
Price, $
$129.59
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.63/FPS
100%
Core i5-2500K
Jan 9th, 2011
Average FPS
184
91%
Min 1% FPS
127
91%
Price, $
$142.08
91%
Value, $/FPS
$0.77/FPS
82%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-10400 vs Core i5-2500K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-10400 vs Core i5-2500K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-10400
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
88%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i5-2500K
Jan 9th, 2011
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
6 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
86%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
60%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i5-10400 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-2500K |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $216.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
65 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Performance | ||
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.3 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.7 GHz |
12 MB | L3 Cache | 6 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2666 MHz | RAM | DDR3 @ 1600 MHz |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
