In Dead Space, the Core i5-10400 is slightly faster than the Core i3-4130. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $106 more expensive!
Core i5-10400
- Up to 1% faster in Dead Space – 176 vs 175 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Dead Space
- Is 6 years and 7 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 6 years and 7 months newer
Core i3-4130
- Up to 72% cheaper – $41.00 vs $147.00
- Up to 72% cheaper
- Up to 72% better value in Dead Space – $0.23 vs $0.83/FPS
- Up to 72% better value in Dead Space
- Consumes up to 17% less energy – 54 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 17% less energy
Dead Space FPS Calculator
Core i5-10400 vs Core i3-4130: Comparison of performance and price
Core i5-10400
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
176 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
92 FPS
100%
Price, $
$147
27%
Value, $/FPS
$0.83/FPS
28%
Core i3-4130
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
175 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
90 FPS
98%
Price, $
$41
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-10400 vs Core i3-4130 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-10400 vs Core i3-4130 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-10400
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
85%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Core i3-4130
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-10400 Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-4130 Sep 1st, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Sep 1st, 2013 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA1150 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 54 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4400 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
