In Battlefield 6, the Core i5-10300H is slightly slower than the Core i9-9900K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-10300H
- Is 1 year and 10 months newer – Sep 17, 2020 vs Oct 19, 2018
- Is 1 year and 10 months newer
- Consumes up to 53% less energy – 45 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 53% less energy
Core i9-9900K
- Up to 13% faster in Battlefield 6 – 85 vs 75 FPS
- Up to 13% faster in Battlefield 6
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i5-10300H vs Core i9-9900K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-9900K
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
85 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
64 FPS
100%
Price, $
$449
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.28/FPS
100%
![Intel Core i9 i9-9900K Octa-core [8 Core] 3.60 GHz Processor - Socket H4 LGA-1151 - Retail Pack](https://howmanyfps.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com/static/cpus/B07KC6V4YF.jpg)
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-10300H vs Core i9-9900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-10300H vs Core i9-9900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-10300H
Sep 17th, 2020
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
4.5 GHz
90%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Core i9-9900K
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
91%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-10300H Sep 17th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-9900K Oct 19th, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 17th, 2020 | Released | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| – | MSRP | $488.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | LGA1151 |
45 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2933 MHz (DDR3), 2933 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| UHD Graphics | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
