In The Callisto Protocol, the Core i5-10200H is slightly faster than the Xeon E3-1270. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-10200H
- Up to 12% faster in The Callisto Protocol – 120 vs 107 FPS
- Up to 12% faster in The Callisto Protocol
- Is 9 years and 5 months newer – Sep 17, 2020 vs Apr 03, 2011
- Is 9 years and 5 months newer
- Consumes up to 44% less energy – 45 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 44% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E3-1270
No clear advantages
The Callisto Protocol FPS Calculator
Core i5-10200H vs Xeon E3-1270: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-10200H vs Xeon E3-1270 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-10200H vs Xeon E3-1270 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-10200H
Sep 17th, 2020
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
75%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
71%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Xeon E3-1270
Apr 3rd, 2011
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
93%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-10200H Sep 17th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E3-1270 Apr 3rd, 2011 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 17th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2011 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Server |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | LGA1155 |
45W | Power Consumption | 80W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2933 MHz (DDR3), 2933 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR3 |
UHD Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
