In Tom Clancy's The Division 2, the Core i5-10200H is slower than the Core i7-10700F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-10200H
- Is 4 months and 18 days newer – Sep 17, 2020 vs Apr 30, 2020
- Is 4 months and 18 days newer
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 45 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 31% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-10700F
- Up to 30% faster in Tom Clancy's The Division 2 – 82 vs 63 FPS
- Up to 30% faster in Tom Clancy's The Division 2
Tom Clancy's The Division 2 FPS Calculator
Core i5-10200H vs Core i7-10700F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
82 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
1 FPS
100%
Price, $
$245
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.98/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-10200H vs Core i7-10700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-10200H vs Core i7-10700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-10200H
Sep 17th, 2020
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
6 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
85%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-10200H Sep 17th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-10700F Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 17th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | LGA1200 |
45W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2933 MHz (DDR3), 2933 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
