In Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020, the Core i5-10200H is slightly slower than the Core i5-9400F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-10200H
- Is 1 year and 8 months newer – Sep 17, 2020 vs Jan 08, 2019
- Is 1 year and 8 months newer
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 45 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 31% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-9400F
- Up to 1% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 – 102 vs 101 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 FPS Calculator
Core i5-10200H vs Core i5-9400F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Average FPS
102 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
75 FPS
100%
Price, $
$119.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.17/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-10200H vs Core i5-9400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-10200H vs Core i5-9400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-10200H
Sep 17th, 2020
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
6 MB
67%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Core i5-9400F
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
9 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
91%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-10200H Sep 17th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-9400F Jan 8th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 17th, 2020 | Released | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | LGA1151 |
45 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2933 MHz (DDR3), 2933 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
